Toronto has a history of being forerunners in the history of hair transplantation. One of the true pioneers of Toronto hair transplants is Dr. David J Seager. Dr. Seager was the first to perform high density “one pass” sessions, high density sessions meaning an excess of 3,000 grafts at a time. He performed this procedure first in the mid-1990s and has continued to teach and practice this technique. Today, Sure Hair Toronto still practices and performs his techniques. Dr. Seager also established what would become known within the hair transplant community as “Ultra Refined Follicular Unit Hair Transplantation”. Dr. Seager would place 3,000 grafts densely packed “One area – One session”, then the grafts were immediately placed into the incision after the tiny needle incision was made. This technique is referred to as “stick and place” technique.
STICK AND PLACE
Dr. Seager used an old fashioned 4mm punch, plug grafts, mini-micro grafts, follicular unit grafts as harvested by strip surgery and follicular unit extraction (FUE). Later, implanter pens were introduced to the hair transplant procedure and have made stick and place a much more popular and simple placement technique. In a traditional hair transplant procedure the follicular units grafts (hairs) are obtained from the back of the scalp (sometimes from other areas of the scalp and body as well). These hairs are first removed from the donor zone and they are then transplanted onto the scalp by generating small incisions called ‘recipient sites’. Firstly, the surgeon and his team typically make all of the recipient site incisions first and then transplant the follicular hair units into each recipient site one by one. However with the ‘stick and place’ technique, the follicular hair unit will be placed into the recipient site immediately after the incision is made, and this will be continued until the hair restoration procedure is complete.
As the skin is very elastic, incisions will begin to shrink over time. During a traditional hair transplant procedure the surgical team will compensate for this by making the incisions slightly larger than the grafts. So when the graft is ready for implantation the incision is the correct size. With the ‘stick and place’ technique, the recipient site has less time to shrink, so the recipient site is closer to the size of the grafts to be placed into the recipient site. Smaller incisions may mean less bleeding (and therefore fewer infections and complications such as necrosis), denser looking hair and minimal scarring. Additionally, the ‘stick and place; technique may result in a decrease in the amount of epinephrine required to control bleeding. Therefore, with the ‘stick and place’ technique grafts could be subjected to less hypoxia and this may manifest as better clinical results.
At Sure Hair Toronto, we have our signature UnistrandTM Hairline, which uses the ‘stick and place’ method as well as dense packing. With this method we can ensure that we are able to perfectly implant even the smallest single unit hair grafts into the scalp without damaging the hair bulb. This provides a higher graft survival rate and also ensures that the hairs are implanted at the correct angulation to the scalp. Together this looks as natural as your own growing hair. This single UniStrand™ “stick and place” method improves our results because we are able to achieve denser looking results with fewer grafts, as this method helps ensure a higher hair graft success rate when transplanting. Dr. Seager believed that with the ‘stick and place’ technique, one could more densely pack “chubbier” grafts. He liked this because he believed that telogen (i.e. invisible resting) follicles and chubbier grafts generally survive better than “skinny” grafts. These findings were confirmed in a study done by Dr. Seager in Toronto, in 1997 and Dr. Beehner in 1999 comparing chubby versus skinny grafts. Chubby grafts have a higher regrowth rate over skinny grafts after 6 months1,2.
Dr. Seager was one of the first hair transplant surgeons to stop using punch grafts and implement minigraft hair transplantation to help his signature dense packing, natural hair look.
In fact, in 2001, Dr. Seager was recognized for his “signature” one pass, technique, when the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgeons presented him with the Golden Follicle Award.
This technique provides patients with a much more natural hair line than other techniques that have been used in the past such as scalp reduction.
Scalp reduction is a process in which an area of bald skin is cut out and removed from the top and back of the scalp and then the resulting gap is then stitched closed.
Scalp reduction reduces the size of the area requiring transplantation and therefore has been in in conjunction with other treatments. This is not recommended today as multiple, painful procedures are required and additionally the skin can stretch back, so a previously bald crown will again become a bald crown but there will also be an unnatural scar.
It can also lead to dispersal of the donor hair, so less donor hair can be manipulated. It is rare to perform a scalp reduction these days. Clearly, Dr. Seager of Toronto pioneered this dense-packing of follicular unit grafts to complete an area of baldness in one session.
Sure Hair Toronto has been performing dense-packed follicular unit hair transplantation and is continually working to improve on the technique.
Toronto, Ontario is a great choice to do a hair restoration surgery and not just due to the strong history of novel hair transplant surgery techniques, in Toronto you can find world-class theatre, shopping and restaurants, but the sidewalks are clean and the people are friendly.
Tourism Toronto, the region hosted more than 43.7 million visitors in 2017. Affordable hotels and plenty of amenities are available in Toronto and therefore make it a top notch destination for hair transplant surgery.
1. Beehner ML. A comparison of hair growth between follicular-unit grafts trimmed “skinny” vs. “chubby.” Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 1999 Apr;25(4):339–40.
2. Seager DJ. Micrograft size and subsequent survival. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 1997 Sep;23(9):757–761; discussion 762.